[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[zonecheck-tests] Re: New test for Zonecheck
From: |
Marcos Sanz/Denic |
Subject: |
[zonecheck-tests] Re: New test for Zonecheck |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 22:09:48 +0200 |
> On the other end, the use of EDNS0 is a Good Thing (because 512 bytes
> is too small, anyway) and, rather than screaming at domains who have a
> too large answer, we should scream at the client software for not
> requesting EDNS0. (Section 1.2 of the draft you mentions.)
But we both know that the 512 octet are a real limitation in the resolvers
out there nowadays. An implementation would be helpful, since I am aware
of registries thinking aobut including such tests in their policies.
> I will see to implement these tests in the next release,
Great Stephane!
> but they will certainly generate a warning by default (not a fatal
error)
If it's configurable, then no problem. But IMHO it is important that a
truncation does not happen in the authority section, and this being
violated should be an error.
Best regards,
Marcos Sanz
DENIC eG