Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

chicken-hackers (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sun Sep 30 2012 13:48:21 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• September 30, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Chicken-users] Spiffy & OpenSSL in compiled code, Peter Bex, 13:48
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Chicken-users] Spiffy & OpenSSL in compiled code, Felix, 13:33
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] feature patch: preserving argument names in foreign-lambda and friends, Peter Bex, 07:13
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] slightly more optimistic copy-propagation, Felix, 06:16
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] feature patch: preserving argument names in foreign-lambda and friends, Felix, 05:52
• September 29, 2012
  • [Chicken-hackers] feature patch: preserving argument names in foreign-lambda and friends, Kristian Lein-Mathisen, 20:53
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] slightly more optimistic copy-propagation, Peter Bex, 13:13
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] slightly more optimistic copy-propagation, Felix, 09:38
• September 28, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] read-all/read-string doesn't detect EOF in terminal, Christian Kellermann, 10:26
• September 25, 2012
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] read-all/read-string doesn't detect EOF in terminal, Felix, 15:32
• September 24, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Remove deprecations, Felix, 15:46
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Remove deprecations, Peter Bex, 15:11
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Remove deprecations, Felix, 14:47
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] use more primitive operations in compiler-syntax for formatted output, Peter Bex, 14:01
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] show current keyword style in csi's , r command, Peter Bex, 13:41
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] will we have a release this year?, Andy Bennett, 06:52
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Remove deprecations, Peter Bex, 03:19
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Clean up some code, Peter Bex, 03:19
• September 23, 2012
  • [Chicken-hackers] Do you mind adding `thunk' to e.g. moremacros?, Peter Danenberg, 19:37
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] will we have a release this year?, Ivan Raikov, 18:53
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Clean up some code, John Cowan, 18:35
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] show current keyword style in csi's , r command, Felix, 18:04
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] use more primitive operations in compiler-syntax for formatted output, Felix, 18:00
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Remove deprecations, Felix, 17:58
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Clean up some code, Felix, 17:53
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] Update irregex to 0.9.0, Felix, 17:49
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Remove deprecations, Peter Bex, 16:31
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Clean up some code, Peter Bex, 16:26
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] types.db enhancements, Peter Bex, 10:07
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] Update irregex to 0.9.0, Peter Bex, 09:51
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] will we have a release this year?, Andy Bennett, 09:09
• September 22, 2012
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] types.db enhancements, Felix, 19:18
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] will we have a release this year?, Sven Hartrumpf, 14:07
• September 21, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] will we have a release this year?, Felix, 14:07
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] will we have a release this year?, Ivan Raikov, 09:10
• September 20, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Update irregex to 0.9.0, Sven Hartrumpf, 08:33
• September 18, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Update irregex to 0.9.0, Felix, 17:06
• September 17, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Update irregex to 0.9.0, Peter Bex, 03:08
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Update irregex to 0.9.0, Alex Shinn, 01:01
• September 16, 2012
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Update irregex to 0.9.0, Peter Bex, 15:48
• September 15, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] will we have a release this year?, Felix, 17:01
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] will we have a release this year?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 15:48
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] NetBSD w/ 4.8.0rc3, Timo Myyrä, 02:31
• September 14, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] NetBSD w/ 4.8.0rc3, Derrell Piper, 18:04
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] NetBSD w/ 4.8.0rc3, Jim Ursetto, 17:09
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] NetBSD w/ 4.8.0rc3, Derrell Piper, 15:56
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] NetBSD w/ 4.8.0rc3, Mario Domenech Goulart, 15:34
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] NetBSD w/ 4.8.0rc3, Derrell Piper, 15:24
  • [Chicken-hackers] NetBSD w/ 4.8.0rc3, Derrell Piper, 14:59
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] fix reader for keywords starting with a digit or ".", Peter Bex, 14:53
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Re: OS X: clang's failing 'make check' w/ 4.8.0rc3 tarball, Derrell Piper, 14:02
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Re: OS X: clang's failing 'make check' w/ 4.8.0rc3 tarball, Felix, 13:55
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Simple fix to get rid of the openbsd linker warnings (#923), Felix, 13:53
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] will we have a release this year?, Felix, 13:41
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Re: OS X: clang's failing 'make check' w/ 4.8.0rc3 tarball, Jim Ursetto, 10:53
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Simple fix to get rid of the openbsd linker warnings (#923), Jim Ursetto, 10:30
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Simple fix to get rid of the openbsd linker warnings (#923), Peter Bex, 05:00
• September 13, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] will we have a release this year?, Ivan Raikov, 21:54
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] will we have a release this year?, Christian Kellermann, 15:31
  • [Chicken-hackers] will we have a release this year?, Felix, 15:13
• September 12, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add info about "make check" to the README, Mario Domenech Goulart, 18:04
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add info about "make check" to the README, Peter Bex, 16:58
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add info about "make check" to the README, Mario Domenech Goulart, 16:54
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] fix reader for keywords starting with a digit or ".", Felix, 16:32
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] rules.make: use $(LINKER) instead of hardcoded gcc for cygchicken-0.dll, Felix, 15:38
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] foreign-declare doesn't work with e.g. #<#END., Peter Danenberg, 09:48
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] foreign-declare doesn't work with e.g. #<#END., Peter Bex, 09:28
  • [Chicken-hackers] foreign-declare doesn't work with e.g. #<#END., Peter Danenberg, 09:03
• September 11, 2012
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] rules.make: use $(LINKER) instead of hardcoded gcc for cygchicken-0.dll, Mario Domenech Goulart, 19:02
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 18:04
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] 4.8.0 release?, Christian Kellermann, 14:44
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] 4.8.0 release?, Felix, 14:41
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Felix, 14:33
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 14:21
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Felix, 14:17
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Segfault with chicken 4.8.0 RC3, Thomas Hintz, 13:19
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 12:42
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] 4.8.0 release?, Christian Kellermann, 12:40
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 11:55
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 03:33
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Felix, 01:33
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 00:03
• September 10, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 20:59
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 20:52
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 20:27
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 17:37
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Felix, 15:23
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Segfault with chicken 4.8.0 RC3, Thomas Hintz, 13:44
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Segfault with chicken 4.8.0 RC3, Peter Bex, 13:35
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Segfault with chicken 4.8.0 RC3, Thomas Hintz, 13:09
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Segfault with chicken 4.8.0 RC3, Peter Bex, 12:56
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Segfault with chicken 4.8.0 RC3, Thomas Hintz, 12:53
  • [Chicken-hackers] Segfault with chicken 4.8.0 RC3, Thomas Hintz, 12:05
• September 09, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] OS X: clang's failing 'make check' w/ 4.8.0rc3 tarball, Derrell Piper, 18:21
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] OS X: clang's failing 'make check' w/ 4.8.0rc3 tarball, Peter Bex, 18:13
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] OS X: clang's failing 'make check' w/ 4.8.0rc3 tarball, Derrell Piper, 18:06
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] OS X: clang's failing 'make check' w/ 4.8.0rc3 tarball, Mario Domenech Goulart, 18:01
  • [Chicken-hackers] OS X: clang's failing 'make check' w/ 4.8.0rc3 tarball, Derrell Piper, 17:49
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Felix, 16:06
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 15:31
  • [Chicken-hackers] Fwd: Re: 4.8.0 release?, Alaric Snell-Pym, 13:32
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] 4.8.0 release?, Christian Kellermann, 12:05
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 10:02
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] chicken.h: define C_noret as __attribute__ ((noreturn)) for clang too, Mario Domenech Goulart, 09:41
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add info about "make check" to the README, Felix, 09:32
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] chicken.h: define C_noret as __attribute__ ((noreturn)) for clang too, Felix, 09:32
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Felix, 09:22
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add info about "make check" to the README, Peter Bex, 09:22
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] 4.8.0 release?, Felix, 09:20
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 09:13
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Cygwin issues, Felix, 09:12
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add info about "make check" to the README, Mario Domenech Goulart, 09:06
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add info about "make check" to the README, Peter Bex, 08:08
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Mario Domenech Goulart, 07:35
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] 4.8.0 release?, Peter Bex, 06:57
  • [Chicken-hackers] Chicken UK 2012 is this month :-D, Alaric Snell-Pym, 05:36
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] 4.8.0 release?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 01:23
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Mario Domenech Goulart, 01:15
• September 08, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Cygwin issues, John Cowan, 21:06
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Cygwin issues, Mario Domenech Goulart, 20:59
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 19:56
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 19:35
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Mario Domenech Goulart, 17:20
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Felix, 17:12
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Felix, 17:09
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Peter Bex, 17:00
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 17:00
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Cygwin issues, John Cowan, 16:58
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Cygwin issues, Mario Domenech Goulart, 16:53
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Felix, 16:52
  • [Chicken-hackers] Cygwin issues, John Cowan, 16:38
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Peter Bex, 16:32
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, John Cowan, 16:22
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Peter Bex, 15:27
  • [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 15:23
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Mario Domenech Goulart, 13:55
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Peter Bex, 08:41
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Felix, 08:19
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Peter Bex, 08:07
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] chicken.h: define C_noret as __attribute__ ((noreturn)) for clang too, Jim Ursetto, 00:58
• September 07, 2012
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for "deprecated" declaration, Felix, 17:53
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] chicken.h: define C_noret as __attribute__ ((noreturn)) for clang too, Mario Domenech Goulart, 13:37
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] chicken.h: define C_noret as __attribute__ ((noreturn)) for clang too, Peter Bex, 13:31
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] 4.8.0 release?, Thomas Hintz, 04:22
• September 06, 2012
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] chicken.h: define C_noret as __attribute__ ((noreturn)) for clang too, Mario Domenech Goulart, 21:27
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] 4.8.0 release?, Peter Bex, 15:18
  • [Chicken-hackers] 4.8.0 release?, Felix, 15:08

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc