a2ps-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CVS Archive


From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: CVS Archive
Date: 03 Sep 2002 08:03:56 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter)

| Hi Akim,

Hi Ed,

Please, keep all this public, as I have some other people willing to
participate.

| I think I managed to update the files after updating 
| all of the packages...

Great!  I try to release Autoconf soon, and henceforth, a2ps will use
only released tools.

| Here is what I get however:
| 
| (update command)
| % cvs address@hidden:/cvsroot/a2ps co a2ps
| (bootstrap)
| % ./bootstrap 
| Bootstrapping a2ps...
| autoreconf: working in `.'
| autoreconf: running: aclocal -I m4 --output=aclocal.m4t
| autoreconf: `aclocal.m4' is unchanged
| aclocal.m4:4879: error: m4_defn: undefined macro: 
| _m4_divert_diversion
| autoconf/c.m4:816: AC_C_BACKSLASH_A is expanded from...
| aclocal.m4:4879: the top level
| autoreconf: configure.in: not using Gettext
| autoreconf: configure.in: not using Libtool
| autoreconf: running: /usr/local/bin/autoconf --force
| aclocal.m4:4879: error: m4_defn: undefined macro: 
| _m4_divert_diversion
| autoconf/c.m4:816: AC_C_BACKSLASH_A is expanded from...
| aclocal.m4:4879: the top level
| autoreconf: /usr/local/bin/autoconf failed with exit 
| status: 1
|  at /usr/local/bin/autoreconf line 440
| 
| % autoreconf --version
| autoreconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.53b

Hm...  I wonder why you have this problem.  I thought AC_C_BACKSLASH_A
*was* is 2.53b.  So maybe I am wrong.  I'll roll up a newer Autoconf
tarball soon, and I'll let you know.


| Note: I did NOT heed the following advice in the
| libtool README file:
| 
| IMPORTANT:
| ==========
| 
| ** Until the next release of automake, you should apply 
| the patch at **
| ** the end of this file to your installed automake 
| script if you     **
| ** intend to use it in conjunction with this release of 
| libtool.     **
| 
| 
| I suspect that it has outdated information.

I suppose it is.  I don't know if Libtool is maintained :(




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]