[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Accessibility] Re: [Kde-accessibility] focus tracking
From: |
Thomas Lübking |
Subject: |
[Accessibility] Re: [Kde-accessibility] focus tracking |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Jul 2010 14:23:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34-ARCH; KDE/4.4.5; i686; ; ) |
Am Wednesday 07 July 2010 schrieb Martin Sandsmark:
> On Wednesday 07 July 2010 11:21:25 Piñeiro wrote:
> > As Joseph explained, this "little smartness" are the heuristics
> > implemented in Orca.
>
> If I understood Thomas right, the "little smartness" is highly widget/app
> specific, and therefore doesn't make sense to try to have outside of the
> widget toolkit/application.
Indeed.
Think of a mix'd kwrite window. Nearby the entire screen is covered by the
focus'd widget, but only the client process (kwrite) has any reliable* chance
to determine the exact position of the I-beam.
Better:
it even quite knows *why* the focus has been given, allowing you to prevent
nasty jumps when sth. just grabs focus programatically.
A 3rd prcocess could maybe diff the frames and match that against the focus'd
widget reagion, what would dramatically fail when kwrite highlights barackets
etc.
*except for doubling headers, inspecting the process memory, looking for class
footprints, pray for matching ABI and reinterpret_cast'ing the relevant
portion - of ref'd stack, in doubt ;-)
On Wednesday 07 July 2010 11:21:25 Piñeiro wrote:
> do you want to bypass at-spi and made a direct comunication
> between a Qt app and the magnification tool?
No - I did not intend to suggest bypassing AT-SPI, I didn't mean to talk about
protocols at all.
I just wanted to point out that there's a better way to track focus than
relying on (unspecified) heuristics of a foreign process. (and in that not
even intended to offend Orca - it might be required for Gtk+ - dunno ;-)
Cheers,
Thomas
[Accessibility] Re: [Kde-accessibility] focus tracking, Thomas Lübking, 2010/07/07