accessibility
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Accessibility] Thinking Further About Speech Recognition


From: Christian Hofstader
Subject: [Accessibility] Thinking Further About Speech Recognition
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:44:21 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100527 Thunderbird/3.0.5

Eric wrote a very thoughtful message regarding the ups and downs of trying to make an entirely libre speech recognition package or building a hybrid that uses a proprietary engine that already exists and building a libre UI and pre-processor component. The goal would be ultimately to replace the proprietary engine with one built by our community and carrying a free software license but, in the meantime, using some sort of off-the-shelf solution.

This has a very big problem: even if we accepted using a proprietary engine until we could build

    our own replacement, we would be creating a big set back. If there is a
    workable solution - free, proprietary, hybrid, etc. people will not
    volunteer to make a libre replacement unless we can demonstrate how it
    could outperform the hybrid, which will be hard and likely to push
    volunteers into other projects where no analogue exists.

Thus, FSF/GNU cannot endorse a temporary proprietary solution as it will likely 
either postpone or entirely scrap the development of a libre engine that we can 
endorse.

FSF/GNU protects people's computing freedoms and would not want to take 
anything away by using a proprietary solution even temporarily in this case.


So, I propose that we launch a speech reco user interface and pre-processor project that is 100% libre. The different sub-projects can talk to libre engines and be entirely endorsed by FSF/GNU.

HH,
cdh





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]