[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Access-activists] Re: [Accessibility] Accessibility Status: Swamped
From: |
Piñeiro |
Subject: |
Re: [Access-activists] Re: [Accessibility] Accessibility Status: Swamped |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:12:39 +0200 (CEST) |
From: Joanmarie Diggs <address@hidden>
> We need to remedy this Orca problem independent of the CORBA/D-Bus
> problem. That way, once things are fixed in both, Orca can become the
> screen reader of choice due to the compelling, competitive, performant,
> and free access it provides.
Yes of course. Sorry, my previous mail was not clear enough.
I was not trying to say that in order to improve Orca performance, we
should focus *only* in improve at-spi2 performance. I was trying to
say that Orca performance issues can also be improved if at-spi2
performance at-spi2 is improved.
Probably being too optimistic, I was trying to say that if we have
enough resources, it would be good to
a) have people assigned to improve Orca performance
b) have people assigned to improve at-spi2 performance
As b) would mean a indirect way to improve Orca performance.
Of course, now we need to decide the priorities. As Mike Gorse (and
Mark Doffman?) is already using part of his time on at-spi2, probably
new teams can start working directly on Orca.
Sorry for not explain myself properly in my previous mail, and sorry
for the noise.
BR
===
API (address@hidden)
[Accessibility] Re: Accessibility Status: Swamped, John Sullivan, 2010/08/11