[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Acl-devel] [PATCH] add 64-bit Arm xattr syscall numbers
From: |
Kamil Dudka |
Subject: |
Re: [Acl-devel] [PATCH] add 64-bit Arm xattr syscall numbers |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:20:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) |
On Friday 22 March 2013 09:41:50 Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20 March 2013 17:10, Brandon Philips <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Brandon Philips <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> A link to your build system showing it building would be nice to include
> >> in the commit log.
> >
> > Let me know if this commit message works for you:
>
> I sent some test builds to debian with that commit and they all
> succeeded so far:
>
> arm:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=attr&arch=armhf&ver=1%3A2.4
> .46-8.1&stamp=1363937934 ia64:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=attr&arch=ia64&ver=1%3A2.4.
> 46-8.1&stamp=1363939208 powerpc:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=attr&arch=powerpc&ver=1%3A2
> .4.46-8.1&stamp=1363938233 s390x:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=attr&arch=s390x&ver=1%3A2.4
> .46-8.1&stamp=1363938229
>
> More logs for more archs will be here:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=attr&suite=experimental
>
> I also tested binaries locally on x86_64, and setting a reading
> extended attributes work fine.
Is the patch going to be included in the next version of attr?
We have exactly the same request in our bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/957989
Kamil
- Re: [Acl-devel] [PATCH] add 64-bit Arm xattr syscall numbers,
Kamil Dudka <=