[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Acl-devel] memory leak - __acl_init_obj, __new_var_obj_p
|
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Acl-devel] memory leak - __acl_init_obj, __new_var_obj_p |
|
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jul 2015 06:37:25 -0400 |
On 14 Jul 2015 11:45, Andreas Stieger wrote:
> > [ 124s] =================================================================
> > != ~
> > [ 124s] ==7762==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks != ~
> > [ 124s] != ~
> > [ 124s] Indirect leak of 216 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: != ~
> > [ 124s] #0 0x7f94b5001c4a in malloc (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.2+0x96c4a)
> > != ~
> > [ 124s] #1 0x7f94b4d610bc in __acl_init_obj
> > (/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/acl-2.2.52/libacl/.libs/libacl.so.1+0x70bc) !=
> > ~
> > [ 124s] != ~
> > [ 124s] Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: != ~
> > [ 124s] #0 0x7f94b5001c4a in malloc (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.2+0x96c4a)
> > != ~
> > [ 124s] #1 0x7f94b4d6423a in __new_var_obj_p
> > (/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/acl-2.2.52/libacl/.libs/libacl.so.1+0xa23a) !=
> > ~
> > [ 124s] != ~
> > [ 124s] SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 272 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
> > != ~
>
> This is probably a minor concern, but maybe the above makes sense to fix?
what is the actual test case ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature