RE: [Adonthell-artwork] gfx documentation

[walther-franks]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden Behalf Of
> Alexandre Courbot
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:54 PM
> To: Adonthell Artwork List
> Subject: Re: [Adonthell-artwork] gfx documentation
>
>
> > Two thoughts:
> > -Is it that sensible to use a code documentation system for a subject
> > (mapgrafix) that doesn't involve any code?
>
> Sensible! :) The advantage I'd see with Doxygen is that it can generate
> in both HTML and LaTeX format. But on the other hand, a latex2html is
> quickly done, and gives excellent results.
>
> > -the second point is a more private one: Although there's also
> a version for
> > Window~, I haven't figured out how to work it there, since it's
> command line
> > based...
> > (I'd be happy to use LaTex!)
> >
> > Your thoughts?
>
> I have nothing against LaTeX, on the contrary. So unless Kai has
> something in mind I missed, feel free to use whatever you want - as long
> as you don't write them with MS-Word ;)

Ok, I'll do that, then. Trouble is, James doesn't know LaTeX, but if I set
up the document, it'll probably be easy for him just add plain text.

> On a more personnal note, mastering LaTeX would be greatly appreciated
> by your IT teachers if you write your various reports with it,
> especially since it's your first year studying IT. You can't imagine how
> many guys at my univ (who are studying IT since 4 years now!) write
> their reports with Word. At best, they get scolded - but these are the
> details which makes you a good or bad student in your teacher's mind. :)

Yeah, you're very right about that. I've also started turning my nose up at
word-users... ;)

BEN