[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fwd: [Ampu-dev] Initial Use Cases up, but have questions]
From: |
alfred . differ |
Subject: |
Re: [Fwd: [Ampu-dev] Initial Use Cases up, but have questions] |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:13:34 -0500 |
8)
You got it.
Scenarios start with one use case and may describe situations requiring
extension or inclusion use cases.
The numbering is mostly a naming convenience. Don't let it get in the way
of a good scenario description. The best scenarios can be reused later for
testing purposes.
-al
Lee Braiden <address@hidden>@mail.freesoftware.fsf.org on 03/11/2002
04:14:58 AM
Please respond to address@hidden
Sent by: address@hidden
To: "AMPU Developers' List" <address@hidden>
cc:
Subject: [Fwd: [Ampu-dev] Initial Use Cases up, but have questions]
I wrote:
>[snip]
>Is the Scenario numbering OK?
>[snip]
Hmmm.. I realised last night that I probably got this backwards. I
guess we do multiple scenarios per Use Case ?
If that is true, though, do they need to be limited to the details of
that particular Use Case, or can two Use Cases share a Scenario?
--
Lee Braiden,
AMPU Team
"coding a better government"
http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/ampu/
ICQ: 24346459
AIM: FallibleDragon
signature.asc
Description: Binary data