|
From: | Ulf Ochsenfahrt |
Subject: | [Apso-devel] Cross-posting: netsync transport encryption? |
Date: | Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:16:41 +0200 |
User-agent: | Icedove 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061013) |
Jeronimo wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:08:04PM -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:That would be O (RSA x users) every time you commit... Is it necessary? (Or DSA, or whatever other asymetric algorithm)Just so I write it correctly: The time would be O ( R x U ) per commit, where R = time of RSA(single key) U = number of users So I'd rather change the key only when necessary.
I agree that it's more sensible to only switch revision keys when a change of user trust occurs. Additionally, it might be possible to bring the time requirements down to O(R x log(U)) for a key switch, by using a binary tree of users. Is Apso a branch of monotone? Or does it work entirely different? The website mentions that you plan to support other systems as well, that's why I ask. -- UlfP.S.: I've just subscribed to the apso-devel mailing list. I might be able to get University support for this project. No money, just manpower. It kind of fits in the project I'm working on.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |