[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[AUCTeX-devel] Re: Mailing lists...

From: David Kastrup
Subject: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Mailing lists...
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:26:06 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:

> On Thu, Mar 24 2005, Reiner Steib wrote:
>> I would propose:
>> - Keep the current (=old) Gmane groups.

Not really enthused about that idea.  Can they be hidden from the
group display, so that article links still work, but the groups are
not visible in the group overview anymore?

>> - Create the new mailing lists and request corresponding Gmane groups:
>>   gmane.emacs.auctex.{general,devel,announce,bugs}
>>   (g.e.a.commits (auctex-diffs) and g.e.a.cvs (auctex-commit) later as
>>   you suggested below).
>>   After requesting the Gmane groups, the Gmane admins will sent out
>>   subscriptions reques to the lists and inform the list admin (see
>>   The groups will be created as soon as new messages arrive (or
>>   after archives are imported--I'm not 100% sure about this).
>> - Import the archives into the new groups:
>>   gelp.bugs   -> gmane.emacs.auctex.bugs
>>   gelp.devel  -> gmane.emacs.auctex.devel
>>   ge.auc-tex  -> gmane.emacs.auctex.general
>>   This step is not strictly necessary, but I would suggest to do it.
>>   E.g. it would simplify searching for old discussions/problems if you
>>   don't have to search the obsoleted groups.
> David, what is your opinion/decision on this proposal?  I will
> arrange things with the Gmane admins if you agree.

I wanted to point out that it is probably a bad idea to merge the
archives of several lists, as the discussions are not related.  I have
by now found out that more or less by pure blind luck, this is a 1:1
scheme.  So it probably would not harm to do this.

>> - Post a reminder on the lists including links to the new Gmane
>>   group(s).
>> - Set the status of the Gmane groups to read-only (i.e. when someone
>>   tries to post thru Gmane, he will get a reply telling so).
>>   Additionally the list admins of address@hidden and
>>   address@hidden could remove the subscription of the
>>   corresponding Gmane accounts: that no more messages will be added to
>>   the old groups.

That would be a good idea, I think.  The old lists are gated to the
new ones, anyway, so nothing would get lost.

David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]