[AUCTeX-devel] Re: preview-latex 0.9.1 and AUCTeX 11.whatever

[Jan-Åke Larsson]

David Kastrup wrote:
> > > Well, at least we have found that the Emacs-version specific 
> > > site-lisp directory typically appears before the Emacs-version 
> > > neutral site-lisp directory (which makes sense).
> >
> > Very good.
>
> Not necessarily.  We want to be in the Emacs-version neutral 
> site-lisp directory ("version" meaning something like 21.3, not 
> "flavor" which would be emacs/xemacs).

I meant to write "Very good, we'll need to fix this. Straight away."

> > auto.el? ..reading... And lisppackagelispdir is nowhere to be found
> >  in either configure.in nor aclocal.m4...reading... Oh, 
> > AC_LISPIFY_DIR (shudder) are you really serious on using this? It 
> > must be a nightmare to debug.
>
> Uh, we _were_ already releasing 0.9 with it.  Ok, "we" might be an 
> exaggeration, but we did not really get any complaint about that 
> particular thing, did we?

No, it does work if that is what you mean. Users won't complain.
Developers might.

I've just started wondering if not the "getenv" elisp function would be
usable to transfer information from our configure script to the emacs macro?
/JÅ