[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[AUCTeX-devel] Re: Anything missing for 0.9.2?
From: |
Ralf Angeli |
Subject: |
[AUCTeX-devel] Re: Anything missing for 0.9.2? |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Apr 2005 12:42:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) |
* David Kastrup (2005-04-08) writes:
> I know how much you all enjoy release-at-gunpoint... but do you know
> of anything that needs addressing in preview-latex still?
Nothing in particular.
Maybe some feedback on installing with teTeX 3. (I wanted to have a
peek at it and set it up on my FreeBSD installation.) As installation
directory for preview.sty it found
# kpsewhich preview.sty
/usr/local/share/texmf/tex/latex/preview/preview.sty
The output variables in config.log look like this:
auctexdir='/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp'
bindir='${exec_prefix}/bin'
build_alias=''
datadir='${prefix}/share'
exec_prefix='${prefix}'
host_alias=''
icondir='${lispdir}/preview/images'
includedir='${prefix}/include'
infodir='${prefix}/info'
libdir='${exec_prefix}/lib'
libexecdir='${exec_prefix}/libexec'
lispGS=''
lispdir='${datadir}/emacs/site-lisp'
lispicondir='(expand-file-name "preview/images" load-file-name)'
lisppackagelispdir='(expand-file-name "preview" load-file-name)'
localstatedir='${prefix}/var'
mandir='${prefix}/man'
oldincludedir='/usr/include'
packagedir='no'
packagelispdir='${lispdir}/preview'
prefix='/usr/local'
previewdocdir='${texmfdir}/doc/latex/styles'
previewstartfile='${lispdir}/preview-latex.el'
previewtexmfdir='${texmfdir}/tex/latex/preview'
program_transform_name='s,x,x,'
sbindir='${exec_prefix}/sbin'
sharedstatedir='${prefix}/com'
sysconfdir='${prefix}/etc'
target_alias=''
texmfdir='${datadir}/texmf'
I saw that ${datadir}/texmf comes first in the list of directories to
be checked for texmfdir, so it seems to be intended. But wouldn't be
/usr/local/share/texmf-local? It's probably hard to achieve for BSDs
where all third-party software goes into /usr/local.
--
Ralf
- [AUCTeX-devel] Anything missing for 0.9.2?, David Kastrup, 2005/04/08
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Anything missing for 0.9.2?,
Ralf Angeli <=
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Anything missing for 0.9.2?, David Kastrup, 2005/04/08
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Anything missing for 0.9.2?, Ralf Angeli, 2005/04/08
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Anything missing for 0.9.2?, David Kastrup, 2005/04/08
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Anything missing for 0.9.2?, Ralf Angeli, 2005/04/08
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Anything missing for 0.9.2?, David Kastrup, 2005/04/08
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Anything missing for 0.9.2?, Ralf Angeli, 2005/04/08
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Anything missing for 0.9.2?, David Kastrup, 2005/04/08