[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[AUCTeX-devel] Re: Anything missing for 0.9.2?
From: |
Ralf Angeli |
Subject: |
[AUCTeX-devel] Re: Anything missing for 0.9.2? |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:14:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) |
* David Kastrup (2005-04-08) writes:
> Except in the case of a system installation, I think it reasonable to
> overwrite the site-specific version.
Okay. So it works as designed. (c:
>> It's probably hard to achieve for BSDs where all third-party
>> software goes into /usr/local.
>
> Even the stuff that is in the Ports system?
Yes. The teTeX 3 installation for example was done using the ports
collection.
AFAIU /usr is for the base system, i.e. mostly BSD userland as the
kernel lives in /boot. Then there is /usr/X11R6 for X and programs
running on X (e.g. firefox and gkrellm executables are in
/usr/X11R6/bin) and /usr/local for the majority of programs from the
ports collection.
--
Ralf