Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Renaming font-latex-title-fontify and font-latex-title-N-face

[David Kastrup]

Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:

> On Fri, Apr 22 2005, Reiner Steib wrote:
>
>> ,----[ M-x apropos-variable RET font-latex.*fontify RET ]
>> | font-latex-fontify-script
>> |   Variable: If non-nil, fontify subscript and superscript strings.
>> | font-latex-title-fontify
>> |   Variable: Whether to fontify LaTeX titles with varying height [...]
>> `----
>>
>> It would be nice if both options would be named
>> font-latex-fontify-* or font-latex-*-fontify.  I'd prefer the
>> former, not only because we had a misspelling of
>> `font-latex-title-fontify' upto 11.54, so
>> `font-latex-title-fontify' only appeared in a single release.
>
> I don't know why Peter used the word "title" in this variable and
> faces.  "section" would be more appropriate, I think.

Nitpickingly, it might be something more like "sectioning" or "section
heading", since the section is what comes behind it.

We have also texinfo-heading-face (from outside of AUCTeX) and
LaTeX-section-heading (a function).

> Ralf recently changed[1] the doc string for the faces to "Face for
> sectioning commands at level %s" (from "Face for LaTeX titles at
> level %s.").  I agree to that change and additionally propose to
> rename `font-latex-title-fontify' to `font-latex-fontify-section'
> and `font-latex-title-N-face' to `font-latex-section-N-face'.
>
> Opinions?  Objection?

I think "heading" might be more appropriate.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum