[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] XEmacs packaging/whatever.

From: Ralf Angeli
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-devel] XEmacs packaging/whatever.
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:13:38 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

* David Kastrup (2005-06-19) writes:

> Why is Stephen Turnbull fighting like a madman to declare the binary
> packages as "all-source-included" if they actually distribute separate
> source packages?  And what would the difference be?

I don't think they actually distribute separate source packages in the
sense that there are separate tarballs available for download.  The
`packages' directory in their CVS repository is what makes up the
source package distribution as a whole, that means the packages
together with a build infrastructure.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]