[AUCTeX-devel] Missing bits and pieces...

[David Kastrup]

Hi,

I'd appreciate if somebody would take a look at the following:

We have an install-contrib target for bib-cite.el and tex-jp.el, and
the undocumented tex-fptex.el (as opposed to tex-mik.el).

That's pretty much inconsistent.  I think we should include everything
in a normal installation (yes, this also means tex-mik.el and
tex-fptex.el on a Unix-type installation currently), and the "contrib"
distinction does not seem to make sense to me.  I think I'd also want
to include tex-jp.el even on non-MULE XEmacs installations where
tex-jp.elc can't be generated.

I am not conclusive about what documentation to include in the
packages.  After Ralf has rearranged the doc directory, recompiling
the texi sources is trivial even without Makefile.  Should people be
able to compile a printable manual?  Or should we just include the
info file?  How about the plain text stuff?

People in the States will need to have reference sheet and so compiled
with a different paper size if we include any PS or PDF.  So maybe
just include the sources?

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum