[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: auctex.spec: auctex.el/preview-latex.el vs. suse-
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: auctex.spec: auctex.el/preview-latex.el vs. suse-start-*.el
Sat, 08 Oct 2005 11:14:54 +0200
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
* Reiner Steib (2005-10-06) writes:
> On Sun, Oct 02 2005, Ralf Angeli wrote:
>> * Reiner Steib (2005-09-28) writes:
>>> The disadvantage of this is that the docs (see "grep -nH -e auctex.el
>>> doc/*.texi") refer to `auctex.el'.
>> If this is the only problem I think we can keep it the way it is.
> Would it do any harm if we install it under the original name
> `auctex.el' and `suse-start-auctex.el'?
Then `auctex.el' wouldn't have any function, right? I'd find that
> I'd suggest to re-include the spec file in the `tar-ball' Makefile
> target. Maybe we should move the RPM generation from `full-release'
> to a separate target?
Fine with me. In my opinion `full-release' doesn't even have to
depend on or call this target respectively.