[AUCTeX-devel] Re: Annoyance...

[Ralf Angeli]

* David Kastrup (2006-04-19) writes:

> It is sort of annoying that
>
> %<trace>  some TeX code
>
> is recognized as a "tag" by font highlighting in docTeX mode, but will
> get ripped into pieces by TAB or M-q.
>
> Would it be possible to get reasonable treatment for ^%<[^>\n]+> or
> something like that as a comment prefix?

Does that mean the tag should be prepended to following lines if a
long line gets broken, i.e. should something like

%<tag> some long long long long long long long long long long long long text

become

%<tag> some long long long long long long long long long long long
%<tag> long text

after typing `M-q' with point in the line?  Or must such a line not be
broken at all?

What about indentation?  Should <TAB> be a nop on such a line or only
indent stuff behind the tag?

-- 
Ralf