[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[AUCTeX-devel] Re: Upcoming 11.83 release

From: Reiner Steib
Subject: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Upcoming 11.83 release
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:32:29 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

On Wed, May 31 2006, David Kastrup wrote:

> Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
> Should be something like $Name: release_11_83$ when one checks out a
> copy with cvs co -r release_11_83

Ah, you had in mind to add "$Name: ...$" in the spec file and
construct the "Release:" from this, right?

>> The patch below seems[1] to allow the inclusion of the date from the
>> command line (or from the Makefile).
>> $ rpmbuild -ba --define "micro_version _20060531" auctex.spec
>> $ rpmbuild -ba auctex.spec
> This wouldn't work for
>     rpmbuild -ta auctex-11.83.tgz
> right?  I was trying to come up with a scheme that would "do the right
> thing(TM)" if a user built straight from release or snapshot tarball.

I know that "rpmbuild --rebuild --define ... *.src.rpm" works so I
expect it to work for rpmbuild -ta *.tgz as well.  But unless I commit
my patch I can't tell for sure.  Should I?  (I'd rename
"micro_version" to "rpm_release" or something similar).

Bye, Reiner.
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---  |  PGP key available  |

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]