[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/font-latex.el, v

From: David Kastrup
Subject: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/font-latex.el, v
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:26:35 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:

> CVSROOT:      /cvsroot/auctex
> Module name:  auctex
> Changes by:   Ralf Angeli <angeli>    06/06/04 19:37:00
> Index: font-latex.el
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/auctex/auctex/font-latex.el,v
> retrieving revision 5.155
> retrieving revision 5.156
> diff -u -b -r5.155 -r5.156
> --- font-latex.el     25 May 2006 14:08:40 -0000      5.155
> +++ font-latex.el     4 Jun 2006 19:36:59 -0000       5.156
> @@ -150,6 +150,7 @@
>  QUOTES has to be a list adhering to the format of an element of
>  `font-latex-quote-list'."
>    (set (make-local-variable 'font-latex-quotes-control) nil)
> +  (make-local-variable 'font-latex-quote-regexp-beg)
>    (make-local-variable 'font-latex-quote-list)
>    (add-to-list 'font-latex-quote-list quotes))

What is the deal here?  Is this supposed to be part of the release or
not?  If so, what testing has been done on this change? What is the
concrete purpose of the change?  What problem does it fix?

Sorry if I sound dull here, but when we are trying to get a release
out and we have _no_ release tags placed yet, every change checked in
before the release is pretty much untested.  So it would make sense to
explain why it should be included that late in the game.

David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]