Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/latex.el,v

[David Kastrup]

Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:

> * David Kastrup (2006-07-15) writes:
>
>> It would not be irrelevant since it still has to evaluate add-hook
>> without bombing out.  But if you checked, then that's ok.  I
>> thought I remembered we had some problem in that area, but maybe
>> XEmacs has made progress since then, and maybe it was just
>> add-to-list which had the problem I remembered.
>
> XEmacs 21.4.19 on my Debian system at least supports the 4th
> argument.  As far as I understand the doc string it doesn't make the
> hook local on its own, however.  An interface typical for XEmacs,
> I'd say.

Can be used for doing everything, but it is hard figuring out how to
let it do the subset that actually would make sense?

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum