[AUCTeX-devel] Re: concerns in the documentation

[Surendra Singhi]

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Anyway, (I'm talking to the other XEmacs folks here)
>> wouldn't it be better if we removed AUC-TeX from our packages
>> archive, rather than distributing such an old version ? (I'm not
>> volunteering for the package maintenance; sorry, no time).
>

I feel AUC-TeX is a wonderful package, unfortunately it is not being brought
upto date; but it will be bad for several XEmacs users to remove it
completely. Speaking from my own experience, I would have not found it out
as a substitute for Win-Edt, if it was not a part of package manager. I
can vouch the same for many XEmacs users in my lab, who just use AUC-TeX,
because it is easily downloadable from the package manager, or is a part of
the Sumo.  

Regards,

-- 
Surendra Singhi
http://ssinghi.kreeti.com, http://www.kreeti.com

,----
| "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
|     -- Orwell, Animal Farm, 1945
`----