Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: switch-to-buffer should not record output buffer

[David Kastrup]

Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:

> On Wed, Sep 13 2006, Miguel V. S. Frasson wrote:
>
>>> AFAICS, `switch-to-buffer' in the AUCTeX sources is not relevant
>>> here.  Probably `pop-to-buffer':
>>
>> Yes, `switch-to-buffer' was just my guess. If this code works, very
>> nice.  Thanks.
>
> Does this patch give the result you'd like to have?
>
> --- tex-buf.el        25 May 2006 07:50:57 -0000      1.252
> +++ tex-buf.el        14 Sep 2006 12:39:18 -0000
> @@ -194,6 +194,41 @@
>       (TeX-command-region-end (point-max)))
>      (TeX-command-region override-confirm)))
>  
> +(defvar TeX-record-buffer (featurep 'xemacs)
                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> +  "Whether to record buffer names of genearated TeX buffers.
> +When non-nil, these buffers are put at the front of the list of
> +recently selected ones.
> +
> +This variable has no effect in XEmacs because XEmacs' version of
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

What use is there in setting the variable specifically on XEmacs, when
XEmacs ignores it?

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum