Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Question about AUCTex binding of C-c `

[Ralf Angeli]

* David Kastrup (2006-11-21) writes:

>>> Correct.  Apart from that, it is very inconvenient to type, anyway.
>>> We have not yet been able to agree on a good alternative.  Maybe we
>>> should just leave this to next-error and be done.
>>
>> That would be better.
>
> Well, except that AUCTeX does not get used only on Emacs 22 (which has
> a binding for `next-error').  I tend to forget that.

AUCTeX already maps the binding of `next-error' both on Emacs and on
XEmacs to `TeX-next-error'.

-- 
Ralf