Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: CVS repository synchronization for RefTeX

[Ralf Angeli]

* David Kastrup (2007-01-06) writes:

> Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> * David Kastrup (2007-01-06) writes:
>>
>>> Further discussion to auctex-devel.  We will need to ask some savannah
>>> hacker to make a copy of the Emacs CVS into an AUCTeX module, and then
>>> we'll need to check in the additional files from Carsten.
>>
>> If merging is so easy with Arch as everybody says, we should use it
>> instead of CVS.
>
> I think people use Arch for merging, but still work on CVS
> repositories as the end points.

Michael seems to work only with Arch for ERC development.

> The main point of wanting RefTeX in the AUCTeX repository was to have
> AUCTeX developers work on it.  I doubt that a different version
> control system would be the path to that.

Many people are complaining about the shortcomings of CVS.  And Arch
seems to be more flexible in many ways.  So I think using Arch will
rather have a positive effect on the motivation of people working with
a version-controlled RefTeX.

-- 
Ralf