[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release? |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:56:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:
Hi Uwe,
> > Hm, the XEmacs version I have installed (21.5 (beta 31) "ginger") has
> > it:
>
> > (require FEATURE &optional FILENAME NOERROR)
>
> Has I have been told by Stephen Turnbull, the package
> should be 21.4.X compatible not 21.5.X!
>
> (That is why org mode vs >7 cannot be easily made into a
> xemacs pkg since it works in 21.5.X but not in 21.4.X)
Ok, I see.
> >> Adding `(featurep 'xemacs)' as the first parameter of the `and' call
> >> might be enough to fix the problem because XEmacs likely does not know
> >> about DBus anyway but I'm not sure yet if this is the right solution.
>
> Most likely this is the better solution.
Of course, it has to be (featurep 'emacs). ;-)
I've done that now.
Bye,
Tassilo
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, (continued)
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, David Kastrup, 2012/11/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Tassilo Horn, 2012/11/10
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/10
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/28
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Tassilo Horn, 2012/11/28
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/29
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Tassilo Horn, 2012/11/30
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Uwe Brauer, 2012/11/30
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?,
Tassilo Horn <=
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/30