[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] A few patches for AUCTeX

From: Tassilo Horn
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-devel] A few patches for AUCTeX
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:19:22 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)

Hi Leo,

> [1. text/x-patch; 
> 0001-Fix-a-bug-in-LaTeX-outline-level-for-customised-outl.patch]

Could you please provide some insights to when this patch makes a

> [3. text/x-patch; 0003-Fix-a-bug-causing-Invalid-face-reference-quote.patch]

When do you get the invalid face reference?  I've tried setting

(setq font-latex-user-keyword-classes
      '(("shadow-hidden" (("hide" "{"))
         '((((class color) (min-colors 88) (background light))
            :background "darkseagreen2")
           (((class color) (min-colors 88) (background dark))
            :background "darkolivegreen")
           (((class color) (min-colors 16) (background light))
            :background "darkseagreen2")
           (((class color) (min-colors 16) (background dark))
            :background "darkolivegreen")
           (((class color) (min-colors 8))
            :background "green" :foreground "black")
           (t :inverse-video t)) command)
        ("shadow-mycomment" (("mycomment" "{")) shadow command)
        ("shadow-comment" (("comment" "{")) shadow command)))

so that I both specify a face using a face specification and using its
name, but I don't see any difference (nor errors) with or without your


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]