Re: [AUCTeX-devel] \Bbb{Q} tex--prettify-symbols-alist

[Uwe Brauer]

   > Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:

   > Uh, why?  That's Emacs' built-in TeX mode.  Why would you ever require
   > that in parallel with loading AUCTeX?


   > First try not to use Emacs' built-in TeX mode at the same time as using
   > AUCTeX, or any further analysis is likely a waste of time.
Ok but it is my understanding that tex-mode is needed since


,----
| tex--prettify-symbols-alist is a variable defined in ‘tex-mode.el’.
| Its value is shown below.
| 
| Documentation:
| A ‘prettify-symbols-alist’ usable for (La)TeX modes.
| 
| Value: (("\\setZ" . 8484)
|  ("\\setR" . 8477)
|  ("\\setP" . 8473)
|  ("\\setN" . 8469)
|  ("\\alpha" . 945)
|  ("\\beta" . 946)
|  ("\\gamma" . 947)
|  ("\\delta" . 948)
|  ("\\epsilon" . 1013)
|  ("\\zeta" . 950)
|  ("\\eta" . 951)
|  ("\\theta" . 952)
|  ("\\iota" . 953)
|  ("\\kappa" . 954)
| [back]
`----

And I recall that some difficulties I encountered were solved by Tassilo
however submitting patches to emacs not to auctex. In any case I do what
you suggest.