Re: [AUCTeX-devel] more symbols in pretty

[Uwe Brauer]

> Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:


> You could try this definition:

> (defun tex--prettify-symbols-compose-p (_start end _match)
>   (or (not (eq ?w (char-syntax (char-before end))))
>       (let* ((after-char (char-after end))
>            (after-syntax (char-syntax after-char)))
>       (not (or
>             ;; Don't compose address@hidden
>             (eq after-char ?@)
>             ;; The \alpha in \alpha2 or \alpha-\beta may be composed but
>             ;; of course \alphax may not.
>             (and (eq after-syntax ?w)
>                  (not (memq after-char
>                             '(?0 ?1 ?2 ?3 ?4 ?5 ?6 ?7 ?8 ?9 ?+ ?- ?' ?\"))))
>             ;; Don't compose inside verbatim blocks.
>             (eq 2 (nth 7 (syntax-ppss))))))))

> But I'm not sure if that has wicked side-effects.


I have tested it over a couple of days and enjoy it very much. I suggest
to include it. Did someone else test it?

Regards

Uwe Brauer