[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Prompt for optional short caption parameter.

From: Mosè Giordano
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Prompt for optional short caption parameter.
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:53:57 +0100

Hi Matt,

2016-03-16 15:48 GMT+01:00 Matthew Leach <address@hidden>:
> Mosè Giordano <address@hidden> writes:
>> Hi Matt,
> Hi Mosè,
>> 2016-03-16 1:00 GMT+01:00 Matthew Leach <address@hidden>:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I quite frequently use the optional short-caption parameter that one can
>>> pass LaTeX's \caption macro.  However, when defining a new figure, I'm
>>> not prompted for \caption's optional argument and usually have to add
>>> this in manually.
>>> This patch adds a new prompt when creating a new figure environment that
>>> will ask the user for \caption's optional parameter.  However, to
>>> prevent this becoming an inconvenience, the optional parameter is only
>>> prompted for if the length of the caption parameter is >=
>>> `LaTeX-short-caption-prompt-length'.  The default value of the new
>>> length parameter has a default value of 40 which I chose somewhat
>>> arbitrarily, so can be easily changed if people like or removed
>>> altogether.
>>> Feedback welcome :-).
>> I like your idea and above all tying the prompt for an optional
>> argument to the length of the full caption: this is indeed the reason
>> why one should use a short caption.
>> I have a couple of comments:
>> - the caption command is inserted also in style/longtable.el and
>> style/psfig.el
> Ah, good spot - I missed those.
>> - when you add or change a customizable option (or any interesting
>> feature in general),  please prove its description for the manual as
>> well.  In addition, an entry for doc/changes.texi is warmly
>> recommended.  If the option is there but users have to dig into the
>> code to discover it (or re-read the manual to find new feature,
>> instead of having a clear list of additions) it'll be useful just for
>> you ;-)
> Yep, all good points.  Please see the attached V2 patch which should
> take care of these. :-).

Great, thanks!


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]