[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] my patch? Examn (bidi in preparation)
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] my patch? Examn (bidi in preparation) |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Aug 2016 16:29:24 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:
> Yes, it is a nuisance. As a rule, you (as well as the responsible
> maintainer) will receive a scan with the signature of an FSF
> representative on it: the copyright assignment is a contract with
> requirements for both parties.
> Sometimes stuff goes wrong or delays occur, not always readily
> explainable.
Sorry to nag, but you seem a person to be sufficiently high «placed» in the
GNU/FSF hierarchy either to judge or to give advice.
Yesterday I wrote again the FSF clerk, Donald R. Robertson III,
complaining his missing reaction when I sent him the FSF copyright
papers, the 8th of August, however he still did not answer, do you know
how to proceed?
- [AUCTeX-devel] my patch? Examn (bidi in preparation), Uwe Brauer, 2016/08/22
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] my patch? Examn (bidi in preparation), Mosè Giordano, 2016/08/28
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] my patch? Examn (bidi in preparation), Uwe Brauer, 2016/08/28
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] my patch? Examn (bidi in preparation), Mosè Giordano, 2016/08/28
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] my patch? Examn (bidi in preparation), David Kastrup, 2016/08/28
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] my patch? Examn (bidi in preparation), Uwe Brauer, 2016/08/28
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] my patch? Examn (bidi in preparation), David Kastrup, 2016/08/28
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] my patch? Examn (bidi in preparation),
Uwe Brauer <=
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] my patch? Examn (bidi in preparation), David Kastrup, 2016/08/29