[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch

From: Uwe Brauer
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 17:15:19 +0000
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux)

>>> "Mosè" == Mosè Giordano <address@hidden> writes:

   > 2016-09-17 18:41 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer <address@hidden>:
   >> but what is with the issue of sending patches with
   >> correspond to my private branches but might include (for you) unwanted
   >> revsets? That is not acceptable? I should collapse them?

   > What do you refer to?

Here is a patch how I thought sending it. Note please that it cannot be
applied anymore since you already applied the patch.....

   >> [1]  I see hg facing the same fate as Xemacs, beautiful but not preferred
   >> by most users....

   > I don't have anything against Mercurial, and you can work with hg-git
   > if it works well, but it doesn't seem to be so, right?

Not sure, but for sure I have learned something about mercurial, which
at the end could not really use for the purpose of auctex. ....

   > Bye,
   > Mosè

Attachment: bidi1911.patch
Description: Text Data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]