[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Updating minted.el
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Updating minted.el |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:41:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Arash Esbati <address@hidden> writes:
Hi Arash,
>> Hm, the anomaly sounds strange. Anyhow, your patch looks very good,
>> so feel free to commit it as is. I'll try to reproduce that issue
>> then an see if there can be something done.
>
> Thanks. My original approach is attached as myminted.el. The only
> difference is the re-arrangement at the beginning of the file and the
> ,(list "style" (LaTeX-minted-style-list)) line in
> `LaTeX-minted-key-val-options'.
Just a nitpick, I think
("style" ,(LaTeX-minted-style-list))
is slightly more readable (and completely equivalent).
> Here a small .tex file for testing. When I restart Emacs and open
> this file, Emacs asks if I want to apply TeX-command-extra-options:
> "-shell-escape" and then does not kill the frame. This happens only
> on the first run, after that, it works as expected.
I can't reproduce that with neither the current Emacs master branch nor
Emacs 25.1 (starting them with -Q) and the current AUCTeX master. For
me, the window where Emacs asks if the file-local variable should be
applied is buried after I give my response.
But you say the "frame" is not killed. Do we talk about the same thing?
A frame in Emacs is what everyone else calls a window (i.e., an X11
window with a title bar), and a window in Emacs is what most people
would call a pane.
Bye,
Tassilo