Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Fix for tex-jp.el

[Uwe Brauer]

> On 06 Feb 2017, at 16:45, Arash Esbati <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Ikumi Keita <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>>> I vaguely remember that tests against (X)Emacs should be done via
>>> `featurep' and not against a function or variable; hence I would write
>>> something like this:
>> 
>>>    (let ((lcs (if (featurep 'xemacs)
>>>                   (get-coding-system-from-locale (current-locale))
>>>                 locale-coding-system))))
>> 
>> Unfortunately, not all xemacs versions have the relevant functions.  It
>> seems that xemacs 21.5 has while 21.4 does not.  Maybe it depends on the
>> presence of mule feature.  (I don't know the detail.)
>> So the fboundp test is necessary anyway although adding `(featurep
>> 'xemacs)' is no problem, of course.
> 
> Hi Ikumi,
> 
> I can't tell either, I don't have XEmacs on my machine.  But again, I
> trust that you're right.
> 
> Best, Arash

I am rather sure this is a mule question. No 21.4 vs 21.5

I try to check in the coming days. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> auctex-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature