[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Onwards to lexical binding (attempt 1)
From: |
Ikumi Keita |
Subject: |
Re: Onwards to lexical binding (attempt 1) |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Sep 2020 23:37:15 +0900 |
>>>>> Ikumi Keita <ikumi@ikumi.que.jp> writes:
> By the way, I think this part should be improved:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> modified latex.el
> @@ -1316,9 +1316,9 @@ Just like array and tabular."
> (save-excursion
> (LaTeX-find-matching-begin)
> (end-of-line)
> - (let ((exit-mark (if (boundp 'exit-mark)
> - exit-mark
> - (make-marker))))
> + (let ((TeX-exit-mark (if (boundp 'TeX-exit-mark)
> + TeX-exit-mark
> + (make-marker))))
> (TeX-parse-arguments args))))
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Shouldn't this boundp test be markerp because TeX-exit-mark is now bound
> always?
Or it can just be
(or TeX-exit-mark
(make-marker))
for simplicity.
Bye,
Ikumi Keita
Re: Onwards to lexical binding (attempt 1), Arash Esbati, 2020/09/05
Re: Onwards to lexical binding (attempt 1), Mosè Giordano, 2020/09/05
- Re: Onwards to lexical binding (attempt 1), Tassilo Horn, 2020/09/05
- Re: Onwards to lexical binding (attempt 1), Tassilo Horn, 2020/09/06
- Re: Onwards to lexical binding (attempt 1), Arash Esbati, 2020/09/07
- Re: Onwards to lexical binding (attempt 1), Ikumi Keita, 2020/09/08
- Re: Onwards to lexical binding (attempt 1), Tassilo Horn, 2020/09/09
- Re: Onwards to lexical binding (attempt 1), Arash Esbati, 2020/09/09