[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Sep 2022 08:38:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.9.0; emacs 29.0.50 |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> What I'm really asking here is if there's a willingness to introduce
> the inevitable bit of breakage in exchange for a supposed longer term
> benefit, and/or if someone can think of a better way to move towards a
> better long-term arrangement than the status quo.
I wonder why/if it's important that the AUCTeX modes identify as the
builtin modes, i.e., what would be the issue with having (La)TeX-mode
major-modes which have no relationship to (la)tex-mode at all plus a
setup command users would call in their init file in order to modify
`auto-mode-alist' so that the AUCTeX modes are added?
Bye,
Tassilo
- AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Stefan Monnier, 2022/09/19
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, David Kastrup, 2022/09/19
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Stefan Monnier, 2022/09/19
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration,
Tassilo Horn <=
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Stefan Monnier, 2022/09/20
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Tassilo Horn, 2022/09/20
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Stefan Monnier, 2022/09/20
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Christopher Dimech, 2022/09/21
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Ikumi Keita, 2022/09/22
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Christopher Dimech, 2022/09/22
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Ikumi Keita, 2022/09/23
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Stefan Monnier, 2022/09/23
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Ikumi Keita, 2022/09/25
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Stefan Monnier, 2022/09/25