autobuild-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Autobuild-discuss] Re: proposed autobuild_mode naming scheme


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: [Autobuild-discuss] Re: proposed autobuild_mode naming scheme
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:42:50 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-04-22)

Hello Simon,

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 08:44:57PM CEST:
> > configure: autobuild mode... default
> [...]
> 
> Autobuild uses a few strings to categorize log results: package version,
> $build, $host, hostname, time and date, and a so-called "mode" which my
> patch sets with the $autobuild_mode variable.

I've not finished the autobuild_mode automatic setting stuff yet, but I
have done a test run on various systems with native compiler and GCC,
(and on AIX without and with runtimelinking).

The results can be found here (should be complete in a few minutes):
http://autobuild.josefsson.org/libtool/

I only now realize that the autobuild mode is not used at all for
categorizing results nor display.  So, for example, the logs with
mode 'rtl' and mode 'gcc' are treated as replacing the 'default'
mode logs in relevance.

Would you accept a patch that shows the mode as another column in the
summary, and uses the mode as another indicator for which runs are the
most recent relevant ones?  Also, a sub table keyed on mode would be
good as well.  Otherwise the page will not be easy to read when we add
more results that only differ in mode.  I'd hate to hack around that by,
e.g., adding the mode to the System name or so.

Further, in an off-list version of the table (created with autobuild
plus the patches I proposed earlier), I see that there are still wrong
"Results" entries.  Will fix them ...

Thanks,
Ralf



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]