[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT
From: |
Morten Eriksen |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT |
Date: |
11 Oct 2000 12:51:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.070098 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.98) Emacs/20.3 |
* Akim
| [...] Your patch, as is, does not solve [...]
I know, I know. I don't claim the patch to be perfect, I'm just saying
that it is _better_ than the code it replaces. :^}
| [...] since AC_PROG_CC launches AC_EXEEXT which uses AC_LINK_IFELSE
| which requires AC_PROG_CC, autoconf should and will fail. This is
| the circular dependency I'm referring to.
|
| AC_LINK_IFELSE must keep its AC_REQUIRE on AC_PROG_CC, hence you
| must not use AC_LINK_IFELSE. That's why I first suggested using
| AC_TRY_EVAL: to avoid the AC_REQUIRE.
Yes, I was aware of that problem -- I just can't think of a good way
to solve it at the moment.
| You may call AC_CANONICAL_TARGET (while AC_CANONICAL_HOST is more
| logical), but you must depend on the *_host variables, *not* the
| target vars. See the doc for more details.
I think the attached patch will at least improve the situation a
little bit. I couldn't find anything from config.guess matching the
EMX/OS2 stuff, though.
Regards,
Morten
win32chks.diff
Description: Text document
- [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/10
- [PATCH] A better _AC_EXEEXT, Take II, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT,
Morten Eriksen <=
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/12
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/12
Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Ralf Corsepius, 2000/10/11