Re: Yet Another Failed Check

[Pavel Roskin]

Hello, Akim!

> Thanks for the report.  Actually none is really grave.  The failure of
> test 28 is known, we just have to decide how we want to fix it
> ---which is currently being discussed.  The failure of test 66 just
> demonstrates that AC_FUNC_MMAP forgets to clean its test file, which
> will fix shortly.

I understand I have your support, so I'm applying the fix.
ChangeLog:
        * acfunctions.m4 (AC_FUNC_MMAP): Remove conftestmmap from
        the shell, not from the test program.

________________________________
--- acfunctions.m4      Wed Oct 25 14:17:41 2000
+++ acfunctions.m4      Fri Oct 27 18:59:01 2000
@@ -1060,7 +1060,6 @@
     if (*(data + i) != *(data3 + i))
       exit (1);
   close (fd);
-  unlink ("conftestmmap");
   exit (0);
 }], ac_cv_func_mmap_fixed_mapped=yes, ac_cv_func_mmap_fixed_mapped=no,
 ac_cv_func_mmap_fixed_mapped=no)])
@@ -1068,6 +1067,7 @@
   AC_DEFINE(HAVE_MMAP, 1,
             [Define if you have a working `mmap' system call.])
 fi
+rm -f conftestmmap
 ])# AC_FUNC_MMAP
 
 
________________________________

Regards,
Pavel Roskin