Re: Moving diversions into M4sugar

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Oct 27, 2000, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:

>>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <address@hidden> writes:
Alexandre> On Oct 26, 2000, <address@hidden> wrote:

> We're talking about the same thing then :)

Ok, then.  But I'd still like to keep AC_DIVERT, AC_DIVERT_PUSH and
_POP as aliases.  I recall having seen code that uses them explicitly,
dangerous as this may be, and I see no reason to hide these mechanisms
from autoconf users, which is in effect what we do by not providing
such macros in autoconf's interface.

> But currently I do believe that if AS_ had its diversions, then they
> would be intermixed with some of Autoconf.

I see.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me