[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AS_EXIT
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: AS_EXIT |
Date: |
31 Oct 2000 11:51:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
>>>>> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <address@hidden> writes:
Lars> On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 05:23:07PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Lars> : On Oct 30, 2000, "Lars J. Aas" <address@hidden> wrote: : > How
Lars> about `true' and `false'? : : IIRC, `true' isn't as portable as
Lars> `:'.
Lars> Is `false' more portable than `true' then?
I'm not sure there are really such systems. And the stds then don't
care about these:
The @code{configure} script and the Makefile rules for building and
installation should not use any utilities directly except these:
@c dd find
@c gunzip gzip md5sum
@c mkfifo mknod tee uname
@example
cat cmp cp diff echo egrep expr false grep install-info
ln ls mkdir mv pwd rm rmdir sed sleep sort tar test touch true
@end example
(Heck, ``tee''. I wanted to use tee in the test suite :( )
But it's a wide belief that there are shells where `true' is not a
builtin, hence the preference for `:'. I have no evidence this is
true.
I believe it's more a matter of tradition.
- Re: AS_EXIT, (continued)
- Re: AS_EXIT, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/10/30
- Re: AS_EXIT, Lars J. Aas, 2000/10/31
- Re: AS_EXIT,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: AS_EXIT, Lars J. Aas, 2000/10/31
- Re: AS_EXIT, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/31
- Re: AS_EXIT, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/10/31
- Re: AS_EXIT, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/10/31