[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 breaks at least OSF1 V5.0 [Re: largefiles
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 breaks at least OSF1 V5.0 [Re: largefiles |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Nov 2000 15:15:32 -0800 (PST) |
From: Akim Demaille <address@hidden>
Date: 09 Nov 2000 10:29:08 +0100
| 2000-11-05 Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
|
| * m4/largefile.m4 (AC_SYS_LARGEFILE): Don't worry about
| whether fseeko and ftello are properly declared.
| (AC_FUNC_FSEEKO): New macro, which worries about fseeko (and
| presumably ftello). Do not set _XOPEN_SOURCE; that causes too
| many problems in practice.
This patch is fine with me. Could you submit some documentation?
Sure, here it is:
--- autoconf.texi-1.374 Thu Nov 2 17:44:03 2000
+++ autoconf.texi Thu Nov 9 23:10:39 2000
@@ -3045,6 +3045,12 @@
SunOS 5.4), define @code{HAVE_FNMATCH}.
@end defmac
address@hidden AC_FUNC_FSEEKO
address@hidden FUNC_FSEEKO
address@hidden _LARGEFILE_SOURCE
+If the @code{fseeko} function is available, define @code{HAVE_FSEEKO}.
+Define @code{_LARGEFILE_SOURCE} if necessary.
+
@defmac AC_FUNC_GETGROUPS
@maindex FUNC_GETGROUPS
@ovindex GETGROUPS_LIBS
@@ -4530,17 +4536,14 @@
@defmac AC_SYS_LARGEFILE
@maindex SYS_LARGEFILE
@cvindex _FILE_OFFSET_BITS
address@hidden _LARGEFILE_SOURCE
@cvindex _LARGE_FILES
address@hidden _XOPEN_SOURCE
@ovindex CC
Arrange for
@uref{http://www.sas.com/standards/large.file/x_open.20Mar96.html,
large-file support}. On some hosts, one must use special compiler
options to build programs that can access large files. Append any such
options to the output variable @code{CC}. Define
address@hidden, @code{_LARGEFILE_SOURCE}, @code{_LARGE_FILES},
-and @code{_XOPEN_SOURCE} if necessary.
address@hidden and @code{_LARGE_FILES} if necessary.
The user can disable large-file support by configuring with the
@option{--disable-largefile} option.
- _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 breaks at least OSF1 V5.0 [Re: largefiles, Jim Meyering, 2000/11/05
- Re: _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 breaks at least OSF1 V5.0 [Re: largefiles, Paul Eggert, 2000/11/06
- Re: _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 breaks at least OSF1 V5.0 [Re: largefiles, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/09
- Re: _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 breaks at least OSF1 V5.0 [Re: largefiles,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 breaks at least OSF1 V5.0 [Re: largefiles, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/14
- Re: _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 breaks at least OSF1 V5.0 [Re: largefiles, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/14
- Re: _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 breaks at least OSF1 V5.0 [Re: largefiles, Paul Eggert, 2000/11/14
- Re: _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 breaks at least OSF1 V5.0 [Re: largefiles, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/15
- Re: _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 breaks at least OSF1 V5.0 [Re: largefiles, Paul Eggert, 2000/11/15
- Re: _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 breaks at least OSF1 V5.0 [Re: largefiles, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/16
- Re: _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 breaks at least OSF1 V5.0 [Re: largefiles, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/16
- Re: _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 breaks at least OSF1 V5.0 [Re: largefiles, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/11/15
- Re: _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 breaks at least OSF1 V5.0 [Re: largefiles, Paul Eggert, 2000/11/15
- Re: _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 breaks at least OSF1 V5.0 [Re: largefiles, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/11/15