[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Documenting AC_LANG_CASE
From: |
Alexandre Oliva |
Subject: |
Re: Documenting AC_LANG_CASE |
Date: |
29 Nov 2000 08:24:59 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
On Nov 29, 2000, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
> Now there are: AC_LANG_SOURCE etc. That's the only reason why they
> needed AC_LANG_CASE.
I see. With AC_LANG_SOURCE, it's easy enough to construct
AC_LANG_CASE out of nested ifs. But then, why not provide it in the
first place?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Documenting AC_LANG_CASE, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/23
- Re: Documenting AC_LANG_CASE, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/24
- Re: Documenting AC_LANG_CASE, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/28
- Re: Documenting AC_LANG_CASE, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/11/28
- Re: Documenting AC_LANG_CASE, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/29
- Re: Documenting AC_LANG_CASE,
Alexandre Oliva <=
- Re: Documenting AC_LANG_CASE, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/29
- Re: Documenting AC_LANG_CASE, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/11/29
- Re: Documenting AC_LANG_CASE, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/29