[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: semantique de m4 mal definie
|
From: |
Andreas Buening |
|
Subject: |
Re: semantique de m4 mal definie |
|
Date: |
Fri, 27 Jun 2003 20:48:05 +0200 |
Akim Demaille wrote:
[snip]
> This is good for you, but I don't consider that Autoconf is concerned
> by this. I do plan to use GNU M4's support for dlopen etc. and the
> fact that other M4 don't support it will not be an argument in the
> decision.
Why would you or anybody need dlopen for autoconf?
[snip]
Bye,
Andreas