[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability
From: |
Eric Sunshine |
Subject: |
Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Sep 2003 06:53:00 -0400 |
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:58:54 +0200 (CEST), Akim Demaille wrote:
> Could you make the test case smaller? Are you sure all the tests were
> run with the modified m4?
Okay, I narrowed down the "excess arguments to m4_pushdef" to the following
tiny case:
AC_INIT([crystal], [1], [someone])
AC_ARG_ENABLE([cpu-specific-optimizations],
[AC_HELP_STRING([--enable-cpu-specific-optimizations=level],
[foo, bar])],
[], [])
AC_OUTPUT
It turns out that AC_HELP_STRING is the culprit. If I remove the comma from
[foo, bar], then the error disappears. I suspect that the quoting in the
new definition of AC_HELP_STRING in 2.57d is not working correctly when it
calls the newly introduced AS_HELP_STRING.
-- ES
- Autoconf 2.57d instability, Eric Sunshine, 2003/09/27
- Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability, Akim Demaille, 2003/09/27
- Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability, Eric Sunshine, 2003/09/27
- Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability, Akim Demaille, 2003/09/27
- Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability, Eric Sunshine, 2003/09/27
- Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability, Paul Eggert, 2003/09/27
- Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability, Akim Demaille, 2003/09/28
- Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability, Eric Sunshine, 2003/09/28
- Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability, Akim Demaille, 2003/09/28
- Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability,
Eric Sunshine <=
- Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability, Akim Demaille, 2003/09/28
- Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability, Eric Sunshine, 2003/09/28
- Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability, Eric Sunshine, 2003/09/28
- Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability, Akim Demaille, 2003/09/28
- Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability, Eric Sunshine, 2003/09/28