[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?
From: |
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh |
Subject: |
Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too? |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Dec 2004 07:37:33 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Roger Leigh of the Debian project asked whether we could dual-license
> autoconf.texi, so that it could be distributed under the terms of
> either the GFDL or the GPL. One of his arguments is that the manual
And, meanwhile, the texinfo docs were removed from Debian. I have uploaded
the "autoconf-nonfree" package that generates "autoconf-doc" to non-free
(that isn't Debian, but it is usually available alongside Debian), so that
the docs are available until the issue is fixed in a better way and the
documentation can make it back to the main package.
"autoconf-nonfree" has not made it through Debian's "new package queue" yet,
so I can still request that it gets removed without any fuss. I will be
paying close attention to this thread.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
- OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/17
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Russ Allbery, 2004/12/17
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <=
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/12/18
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/19
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/12/19
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/12/19
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Bruce Korb, 2004/12/19