[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gnulib] aux-dir name - result
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gnulib] aux-dir name - result |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:50:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
* Akim Demaille wrote on Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:24:27PM CET:
> Le 22 mars 05, à 20:26, Paul Eggert a écrit :
>
> >+The auxiliary directory is commonly named @file{build-aux}.
> > If you need portability to @acronym{DOS} variants, do not name the
> > auxiliary directory @file{aux}. @xref{File System Conventions}.
> > @end defmac
> >
> Well, that's news to me, I never saw that name.
>
> It is also "commonly" named config/, but I guess commonness is in the
> eye of the beholder.
Me too. Where did the vote take place (I presume bug-gnulib), and why
did it not take place/was not announced on any autoconf lists?
lists.gnu.org does not show where the announcement _was_ crossposted to.
(No, I don't mind build-aux.)
Regards,
Ralf
- Re: [bug-gnulib] aux-dir name - result, Paul Eggert, 2005/03/22
- Re: [bug-gnulib] aux-dir name - result, Akim Demaille, 2005/03/22
- Re: [bug-gnulib] aux-dir name - result,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: [bug-gnulib] aux-dir name - result, Paul Eggert, 2005/03/23
- Re: [bug-gnulib] aux-dir name - result, Akim Demaille, 2005/03/23
- Re: [bug-gnulib] aux-dir name - result, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/03/24
- Re: [bug-gnulib] aux-dir name - result, Paul Eggert, 2005/03/24
- Re: [bug-gnulib] aux-dir name - result, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2005/03/24
- Re: [bug-gnulib] aux-dir name - result, Akim Demaille, 2005/03/28