Re: [patch] AC_CANONICAL_HOST without install-sh

[techtonik]

Hello, Paul.

On 12/29/05, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> techtonik <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > My word as an author is not enough?
>
> Yes, but it must be in writing.  That is how the US legal system
> works.  See U.S. Code, Title 17, Chapter 2, section 204(a)
> <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000204----000-.html>.

It is already written and archived in ML. To add more - I'm not a U.S.
citizen. Hope it is enough to solve the problem.

>
> We're not particularly happy about the paperwork either, but we do
> want to be legal, for reasons that I hope are obvious.
>
> > I have no desire to participate
>
> That's too bad.  Please reconsider.
>

Ok. You've got my full permission to use the patch for autoconf I've
sent to ML earlier as you wish. I have no more time to waste and I'm
deeply disappointed what I've done so for autoconf. Nothing personal -
I believe you are a good person after all.

--
--t.